2020
DOI: 10.1111/echo.14705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference value of perimeter‐derived diameter assessed by three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in left atrial appendage occluder size selection

Abstract: Background The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of perimeter‐derived diameter (PDD) measured by three‐dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in predicting the size of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder. Methods and results Left atrial appendage landing zone diameter (LZD) was measured by two‐dimensional (2D) TEE, 3DTEE, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as LZD‐2Dmax, LZD‐2Dmean, LZD‐3Dmax, LZD‐3Dmean, LZD‐PDD, LZD‐DSAmax, respectively, before and during transcatheter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with flat oval type whose longest diameter significantly exceeds the shortest diameter, selecting the Watchman occluder device with proximal round shape simply according to the longest diameter may result in the selection of too large occluder and the risk of LAA tear. It has been demonstrated that the landing zone perimeter can better predict the optimal occluder size because the length diameter and short diameter of landing zone ostium will change and the ostium will change to a circular shape after occluder implantation, whereas the perimeter often remains unchanged (20)(21)(22). However, in the aforementioned studies, the landing zone was located using the conventional method, which has the drawback of providing an erroneous assessment of the landing zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with flat oval type whose longest diameter significantly exceeds the shortest diameter, selecting the Watchman occluder device with proximal round shape simply according to the longest diameter may result in the selection of too large occluder and the risk of LAA tear. It has been demonstrated that the landing zone perimeter can better predict the optimal occluder size because the length diameter and short diameter of landing zone ostium will change and the ostium will change to a circular shape after occluder implantation, whereas the perimeter often remains unchanged (20)(21)(22). However, in the aforementioned studies, the landing zone was located using the conventional method, which has the drawback of providing an erroneous assessment of the landing zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a past study, Al-Kassou et al (2017) showed that using the diameter derived from the LZ area and LZ cir as a reference indicator for the occluder model is more relevant to the final choice of the occluder model. Kong et al also showed ( Kong et al, 2020 ) that the diameter derived from the LAA circumference is more suitable as a reference indicator for the occluder model because it is more stable compared to other indicators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%