1980
DOI: 10.1177/001316448004000236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referent Differences in Pupil Motivation: Implications for Test Validity

Abstract: The findings of this study indicate that pupils may exhibit a high degree of motivation in one academic discipline but may have a low level of motivation in another discipline concurrently. Pupils may also show a high level of motivation with respect to one motivational factor in one discipline and a low level of motivation with respect to the same factor in another discipline. Assessments of pupil motivation made without reference to specific disciplines may be both unreliable and invalid when applied to spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Georgia Study Matthews and Chan (1980) reported the results of field tests of an instrument to assess student motivation in dimensions of motivation that parallel the four critical aspects of teacher motivation.…”
Section: Theory Of Teacher Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Georgia Study Matthews and Chan (1980) reported the results of field tests of an instrument to assess student motivation in dimensions of motivation that parallel the four critical aspects of teacher motivation.…”
Section: Theory Of Teacher Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, readers are cautioned to exercise care in the interpretation of instruments assessing nonreferent specific instruments (Matthews and Chan, 1980). Once quantifiable measures are available several options can be considered.…”
Section: Assessing Student Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%