1999
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referrals for dental general anaesthetics — how many really need GA?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in Northern Ireland and in the North‐west of England, general dental practitioners refer most of their paediatric extraction cases for GA [14,15]. However, criticism of such practise has been expressed by showing that 75% of the referred cases could have been treated without GA [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in Northern Ireland and in the North‐west of England, general dental practitioners refer most of their paediatric extraction cases for GA [14,15]. However, criticism of such practise has been expressed by showing that 75% of the referred cases could have been treated without GA [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reports in the literature about overuse of GA in the population without disability [4][5][6]. GA is a procedure which is never without risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A small proportion of children and adolescents need dental treatment under general anaesthesia (DGA), either for medical reasons or because of lack of cooperation during dental treatment. Indications for the need of DGA have been described and discussed in many reports [1–5], and the frequency and reasons for the use of DGA have been shown to vary between countries [6]. Thus, there is a continued interest in DGA because of changes in treatment strategies and treatment needs over the years, limited resources allocated to this kind of dental service in many programs, and the potential risks associated with DGA [7–9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%