2020
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referrals for surgical removal of polyps since the introduction of a colorectal cancer screening programme

Abstract: Aim: Implementation of the Dutch national bowel screening programme in 2014 led to an increased rate of detection of polyps. In general, polyps should be removed endoscopically. However, if the size and location of the polyp make endoscopic removal technically difficult, or if there is a suspicion for early (T1) cancer, surgery is the preferred method for removal. An increasing number of these patients are being treated with minimally invasive surgical procedures instead of segmental resection. The aim of this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of advanced adenomas early T1 cancers with referrals for surgical treatment of these lesions has increased substantially due to the implementation of national CRC screening programs in many countries. 3 CAL-WR seems to fill the gap between endoscopic resection and more advanced surgical procedures, which are accompanied by higher morbidity (24%) and mortality (2%) rates. 13 In the present study only 11% of patients underwent additional oncological segmental resection, indicating that segmental colectomy could be prevented in all other cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of advanced adenomas early T1 cancers with referrals for surgical treatment of these lesions has increased substantially due to the implementation of national CRC screening programs in many countries. 3 CAL-WR seems to fill the gap between endoscopic resection and more advanced surgical procedures, which are accompanied by higher morbidity (24%) and mortality (2%) rates. 13 In the present study only 11% of patients underwent additional oncological segmental resection, indicating that segmental colectomy could be prevented in all other cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B ecause the implementation of a nationwide colorectal screening program in the Netherlands in 2014, the incidence of advanced adenomas and early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and the number of patients referred for colorectal resection for high grade polyps has increased. [1][2][3] Endoscopic polypectomy is a well-established treatment for noninvasive colonic polyps, 4 the majority of which can be removed safely with standard polypectomy. For more challenging polyps advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection, and endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) have improved local resectability compared with standard polypectomy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the implementation of the national bowel cancer screening programme, the number of surgical referrals for benign polyps has tripled [11], whilst at the same time colorectal cancer is more frequently detected at an earlier stage and also the armamentarium of advanced endoscopic (combined with laparoscopic) techniques has expanded, both resulting in a shift to a more common use of local resection techniques [12][13][14]. Combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery techniques, such as the colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection (CAL-WR), can be used to treat patients with endoscopic unresectable benign colonic polyps [15][16][17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%