2005
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referrals to hospital-based rheumatology and orthopaedic services: seeking direction

Abstract: Many referrals to hospital-based musculoskeletal services are likely to be misdirected. Integrated referral and care pathways are required for efficient and optimal care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The development of such pathways will require significant support, education and training for general practitioners.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
65
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Thirty-seven per cent of non-urgent cancer referrals were assessed as being unnecessary according to published guidelines, 5 while 27% of orthopaedic referrals would have been more appropriate for rheumatology. 6 There is also evidence suggesting that, in certain specialties, some patients are not referred until their condition has reached an advanced stage. [7][8][9] Referral-management schemes have been a frequent response to problems of rising outpatient attendances and the associated cost, growth of specialty waiting lists, inappropriate referral, and variation in clinicians' referral rate and quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Thirty-seven per cent of non-urgent cancer referrals were assessed as being unnecessary according to published guidelines, 5 while 27% of orthopaedic referrals would have been more appropriate for rheumatology. 6 There is also evidence suggesting that, in certain specialties, some patients are not referred until their condition has reached an advanced stage. [7][8][9] Referral-management schemes have been a frequent response to problems of rising outpatient attendances and the associated cost, growth of specialty waiting lists, inappropriate referral, and variation in clinicians' referral rate and quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 856 orthopaedic conversion rate (the proportion of referred patients who are ultimately listed for surgery) at such clinics is typically only 30-37% [6,7]. This issue had led groups to restructure their musculoskeletal services with patients selected following screening of referral letters to be seen in clinics staffed by general practitioners with a specialist interest and physiotherapists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The absence of previous investigation results was noted in more than 50% of the referral letters in three separate studies, 3,22,24 patients' medical history was not routinely included in referral information, 13,16,25 and allergies 16,23 and clinical findings 5,17,18,22 were generally poorly recorded. These omissions may be due in part to the fact that there is no real consensus amongst different specialties on the ideal information to be included in a referral letter, beyond an agreement on broad information categories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%