2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11146-016-9566-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinance and Mortgage Default: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of HARP’s Impact on Default Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with recent studies that show large effects of refinancing FRMs on mortgage default. Karamon et al (2016) smaller than the 40% we find. 33…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are in line with recent studies that show large effects of refinancing FRMs on mortgage default. Karamon et al (2016) smaller than the 40% we find. 33…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…There are two months with particularly large spikes in guarantee activity, but these are March and June of 2009-the former being far in advance of the cutoff date (and essentially concurrent with the announcement of the program) and the latter being too late to maintain eligibility. 24 Furthermore, while our data does not contain information on the specific day that a loan was guaranteed, Karamon et al (2016)'s Freddie Mac data does, and they show that guarantee volume is smooth through the cutoff date, as are the observables of the borrowers. Finally, in Appendix A.1 we further test whether securitization speeds for loans in our sample vary by LTV (since HARP eligibility was differentially valuable for different LTV ranges) but find no systematic evidence for this.…”
Section: Was There Non-random Sorting Around the Cutoff Date?mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Altogether, approximately 3.5 million loans were refinanced through HARP before the program ended in 2018. There is evidence that the program had beneficial effects by reducing mortgage default and increasing consumer spending (Agarwal et al (2015); Karamon, McManus, and Zhu (2017); and Abel and Fuster (2019)). Although HARP applied only to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans, the two principal Ginnie Mae loan programs-the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Department of Veteran Affairs (VA)-have had their own streamlined refinance programs for some time.…”
Section: Harp and Other Government Streamlined Refinancesmentioning
confidence: 99%