2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refined element discontinuous numerical analysis of dry-contact masonry arches

Abstract: The behavior of buried masonry arches is studied in this article using the Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (DDA), a numerical method that allows for the physical simulation of the intrinsic structure discontinuities since it is based on contact and friction among pseudo-rigid blocks. Two types of arches (or vaults) are studied with a specially developed computer program, one of semicircular and another of ovoidal shape. The loads are selfweight, lateral filling, embankment thrusts and concentrated (through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations of the method are usually designated by UDEC, NSCD and DDA, Universal Distinct Element Code, Non-Smooth Contact Dynamics, and Discrete Deformation Analysis, respectively. The principal contributions for the analysis of arched structures are: UDEC (Lemos 1998;Tóth et al 2009;Dimitri et al 2011; Dimitri and Tornabene 2015); NSCD (Rafiee et al 2008;Albuerne et al 2013;Rafiee and Vinches 2013;Lancioni et al 2016); DDA (Pérez-Aparicio et al 2013). Thavalingam et al (2001), instead, performed a comparison between DDA, DEM based Particle Flow Code and a non-linear finite element (FEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations of the method are usually designated by UDEC, NSCD and DDA, Universal Distinct Element Code, Non-Smooth Contact Dynamics, and Discrete Deformation Analysis, respectively. The principal contributions for the analysis of arched structures are: UDEC (Lemos 1998;Tóth et al 2009;Dimitri et al 2011; Dimitri and Tornabene 2015); NSCD (Rafiee et al 2008;Albuerne et al 2013;Rafiee and Vinches 2013;Lancioni et al 2016); DDA (Pérez-Aparicio et al 2013). Thavalingam et al (2001), instead, performed a comparison between DDA, DEM based Particle Flow Code and a non-linear finite element (FEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) and Eq. (10). Prior to the beginning of the simulation, a homogeneous distribution of particles has to be defined as initial conditions for the numerical modelling.…”
Section: Numerical Generation Of the Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation of the Discrete Element Method (DEM) [9] probably is the most suitable to simulate the behavior of granular materials in these situations, since it is based on the study of the individual particles and their contact interactions. Additionally, DEM can capture other information such as arrangements of particles or global constitutive laws (contact algorithms in this context, see [10]), aspects very difficult to account for with numerical methods based on continuum media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DDA method is particularly attractive for modeling granular material problems with internal discontinuous geometry. Its applicability ranges from large scale problems (i.e., the mechanical response of rock assemblies and masonry, [28], [24], [26]) to small scale ones (i.e., a previous work for granular discharge of bucket elevators in [25]). The newer reference [22] completes [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%