1996
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refined Structure of Repressor Headpiece (1-56) Determined by Relaxation Matrix Calculations from 2D and 3D NOE Data: Change of Tertiary Structure upon Binding to the Operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, while the headpiece in the absence of nucleic acid (but in high salt concentration) revealed local regions of structure, these local structures were connected by very flexible loops , whereas the hinge region appeared to be completely disordered (Kercher et al, 1997). As a result of binding to DNA, the headpiece gains a rigid helix-turn-helix structure (Lewis et al, 1996;Slijper et al, 1996Slijper et al, , 1997, whereas the hinge region becomes ordered and forms an -helix (residues 50-58), which makes specific interaction with the operator DNA (Spronk et al, 1996;Kercher et al, 1997). When the hinge helix is formed in the repressor-DNA complex, it interacts with the hinge helix of its dimer partner, and, as a unit, the pair of hinge helices of a dimer binds in the minor groove of the DNA (Spronk et al, 1996; Kercher et al, 1997).…”
Section: Dna-binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, while the headpiece in the absence of nucleic acid (but in high salt concentration) revealed local regions of structure, these local structures were connected by very flexible loops , whereas the hinge region appeared to be completely disordered (Kercher et al, 1997). As a result of binding to DNA, the headpiece gains a rigid helix-turn-helix structure (Lewis et al, 1996;Slijper et al, 1996Slijper et al, , 1997, whereas the hinge region becomes ordered and forms an -helix (residues 50-58), which makes specific interaction with the operator DNA (Spronk et al, 1996;Kercher et al, 1997). When the hinge helix is formed in the repressor-DNA complex, it interacts with the hinge helix of its dimer partner, and, as a unit, the pair of hinge helices of a dimer binds in the minor groove of the DNA (Spronk et al, 1996; Kercher et al, 1997).…”
Section: Dna-binding Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1) (7)(8)(9)(10). The N-terminal 60 amino acids in each monomer form a helix-turn-helix motif that directly contacts the operator DNA (7,(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). When isolated, this region exhibits site-specific DNA binding, albeit with significantly lower affinity than the intact protein (11,18,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Function-In earlier studies (26), we identified the N-terminal region of hTS as a degron by ligating amino acids 1-45, spanning the IDR (residues 1-28) and an hA (residues [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], to the N terminus of eGFP. CHX chase analysis indicated that this protein, termed N30-hA-eGFP, has a half-life of ϳ9-10 h in transfected mammalian cells, as compared with Ͼ24 h for the parental eGFP reporter polypeptide (26).…”
Section: The Ha Helix At Residues 31-42 Of Hts Is Required For Degronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Helix-Loop-Helix Motif of the lac Repressor Contributes to Degron Function-Structural studies have shown that the headpiece region is not completely disordered but contains a helix-loop-helix motif (HLH) spanning residues 9 -29 (39). To determine if this motif plays a role in degron function, we analyzed a mutant in which part of the region was deleted.…”
Section: An Idr From Chicken Fibrinogen-␣ Mimics the Degradation Funcmentioning
confidence: 99%