2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9251-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinement of dynamically downscaled precipitation and temperature scenarios

Abstract: A method for adjusting dynamically downscaled precipitation and temperature scenarios representing specific sites is presented. The method reproduces mean monthly values and standard deviations based on daily observations. The trend obtained in the regional climate model both for temperature and precipitation is maintained, and the frequency of modelled and observed rainy days shows better agreement. Thus, the method is appropriate for tailoring dynamically downscaled temperature and precipitation values for c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously used scores include overall measures, such as the root mean square error (Piani et al, 2010b) or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two sample statistic (Dosio and Paruolo, 2011). Other suggested scores assess specific moments of the distribution including the mean (Engen-Skaugen, 2007;Li et al, 2010;Dosio and Paruolo, 2011;Themeßl et al, 2011;Turco et al, 2011;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012), the standard deviation (Engen-Skaugen, 2007;Li et al, 2010;Themeßl et al, 2011;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012) and the skewness (Li et al, 2010). A variety of further scores are based on the comparison of the frequency of days with precipitation (Schmidli et al, 2006(Schmidli et al, , 2007Themeßl et al, 2011) and the magnitude of selected (mostly high) percentiles (Schmidli et al, 2006(Schmidli et al, , 2007Li et al, 2010;Themeßl et al, 2011;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012).…”
Section: Quantifying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously used scores include overall measures, such as the root mean square error (Piani et al, 2010b) or the Kolmogorov-Smirnov two sample statistic (Dosio and Paruolo, 2011). Other suggested scores assess specific moments of the distribution including the mean (Engen-Skaugen, 2007;Li et al, 2010;Dosio and Paruolo, 2011;Themeßl et al, 2011;Turco et al, 2011;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012), the standard deviation (Engen-Skaugen, 2007;Li et al, 2010;Themeßl et al, 2011;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012) and the skewness (Li et al, 2010). A variety of further scores are based on the comparison of the frequency of days with precipitation (Schmidli et al, 2006(Schmidli et al, , 2007Themeßl et al, 2011) and the magnitude of selected (mostly high) percentiles (Schmidli et al, 2006(Schmidli et al, , 2007Li et al, 2010;Themeßl et al, 2011;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012).…”
Section: Quantifying Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years a multitude of studies has investigated different post processing techniques, aiming at providing reliable estimators of observed precipitation climatologies given RCM output (e.g. Ines and Hansen, 2006;Engen-Skaugen, 2007;Schmidli et al, 2007;Dosio and Paruolo, 2011;Themeßl et al, 2011;Turco et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2011b;Teutschbein and Seibert, 2012). Among the most popular approaches are statistical transformations that aim to adjust (selected aspects of) the distribution of RCM (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, until advances in climate system modelling improve the representation of localscale climate processes, there is a need to develop methods to better represent local projections of future changes to key climatic variables. One complication with using RCM outputs for impact studies in mountain regions relates to the terrain smoothing within the model; as a result of this, the elevation of specific sites is poorly represented and the observed climate of specific sites is not accurately reproduced (Coll et al 2005, Engen-Skaugen 2007, Beldring et al 2008. Consequently, the approach explored here used locallyresolved temperature lapse rate models (LRMs) variably integrated with temperature change outputs from an RCM and observed station data.…”
Section: Aims and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we suggest that our work represents an advance in terms of deriving locally relevant projections of temperature change with altitude; for example, Moen et al (2004) did not apply such a range of LRVs in their approach. Similarly, the seasonal range of lapse rate adjustments applied here is wider than the adjustment applied to daily temperature outputs from an RCM to correct for altitude biases between RCM grids and station data by Engen-Skaugen (2007). …”
Section: Lapse Rate Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mountainous areas and regions with complex topography, the RCMs do not provide a representative description of climate variables with sharp spatial gradients, and it is necessary to re-scale the output in order to obtain a realistic statistical distribution (Engen-Skaugen 2004;Skaugen et al 2002). A re-scaling, giving the right mean level or standard deviation, assumes that the RCM reproduces the true shape for the statistical distribution, as well as the correct wet-day frequency in order for other percentiles to also be correct, as all the percentiles are scaled by the same factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%