2006
DOI: 10.1080/01426390600783426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining landscape change models through outlier analysis in the Muskegon watershed of Michigan

Abstract: Balancing natural resource protection and urban development is of concern to researchers, planners and citizens who are aware of the environmental, social and economic impacts of urban land use. Land-use change models can assist in finding this balance. An objective of this research was to build a better model of land-use change by integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques. A modelling approach is presented that combines statistical logistic regression with field-based outlier analysis. To this end, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In explaining the emergence of an urban area, mathematical urban modelling largely employs a linear or logistic regression (Aspinall, 2004;Mertens and Lambin, 2000), Markov-chain change probability (Petit and Lambin, 2002), or a gravity model (Kong et al, 2010;Lowry, 1965). In this type of modelling, the relationship that links the factors and the possibility of urban changes becomes more explicit compared to the early descriptive urban models, rendering the explanatory power and predictive capability better than the early urban models (Machemer et al, 2006). The parameters in a linear equation, for example, represent the weight that measures the contribution scale of a factor on urban growth.…”
Section: Mathematical Urban Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In explaining the emergence of an urban area, mathematical urban modelling largely employs a linear or logistic regression (Aspinall, 2004;Mertens and Lambin, 2000), Markov-chain change probability (Petit and Lambin, 2002), or a gravity model (Kong et al, 2010;Lowry, 1965). In this type of modelling, the relationship that links the factors and the possibility of urban changes becomes more explicit compared to the early descriptive urban models, rendering the explanatory power and predictive capability better than the early urban models (Machemer et al, 2006). The parameters in a linear equation, for example, represent the weight that measures the contribution scale of a factor on urban growth.…”
Section: Mathematical Urban Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%