1999
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining temporal criteria to classify collaborative systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though users cannot use non-replicated artifacts directly on asynchronous/disconnected situations [2] the linking structure would still notify the existence of such an artifact and try to connect to the central memory and retrieve its content, if possible. After the replicated manipulation, the system will evaluate the changes performed and update the central memory whenever necessary.…”
Section: Figure 4 Structured Documentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though users cannot use non-replicated artifacts directly on asynchronous/disconnected situations [2] the linking structure would still notify the existence of such an artifact and try to connect to the central memory and retrieve its content, if possible. After the replicated manipulation, the system will evaluate the changes performed and update the central memory whenever necessary.…”
Section: Figure 4 Structured Documentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, synchronization determines collaborative advances. Thus synchronization can be a way to unify the space and time dimensions of the traditional models [2,8,36], from both the usage and collaborative applications' design perspectives [10]. …”
Section: Synchronization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement of the interactions between class members is of extreme importance to us, since they help students to better understand the subjects. For these reasons, we utilize different forms of collaboration in the course [13], helping the students to communicate among class members in different ways, supporting them in the learning process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%