2023
DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00393-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ellen C. Francis,
Camille E. Powe,
William L. Lowe
et al.

Abstract: Background Perinatal outcomes vary for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The precise factors beyond glycemic status that may refine GDM diagnosis remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of potential precision markers for GDM. Methods Systematic literature searches were performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception to March 2022 for studies comparing perinatal outcomes among women with GDM. We searched for pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 181 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In individuals with insulin-deficient GDM, IGFBP1 amounts were low in the first trimester but amounts during the second semester were on par with those without GDM, suggesting that other pathophysiologic factors contribute to hyperglycemia in this GDM subtype. Given the differences in IGFBP1 in different GDM subtypes, and increasing recognition in the field that GDM is a heterogeneous condition 45 , our finding of persistently lower IGFBP1 levels in the second trimester of pregnancies affected by insulin-resistant GDM may have implications for GDM precision medicine 46 , 47 . Our findings suggest that, in cases of insulin-resistant GDM, the placenta does not increase IGFBP1 production sufficiently; if this association is demonstrated to be causal, this opens the door to a new therapeutic target for this GDM subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In individuals with insulin-deficient GDM, IGFBP1 amounts were low in the first trimester but amounts during the second semester were on par with those without GDM, suggesting that other pathophysiologic factors contribute to hyperglycemia in this GDM subtype. Given the differences in IGFBP1 in different GDM subtypes, and increasing recognition in the field that GDM is a heterogeneous condition 45 , our finding of persistently lower IGFBP1 levels in the second trimester of pregnancies affected by insulin-resistant GDM may have implications for GDM precision medicine 46 , 47 . Our findings suggest that, in cases of insulin-resistant GDM, the placenta does not increase IGFBP1 production sufficiently; if this association is demonstrated to be causal, this opens the door to a new therapeutic target for this GDM subtype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We adjusted for maternal characteristics (maternal age, gravidity, gestational age at plasma samples) in Model 2 and additionally adjusted for maternal BMI in Model 3. We calculated profiled log-likelihood CIs along with likelihood ratio test P values (using MASS 65 and glmglrt ( https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=glmglrt ) packages 47 in R). In SPRING and MOMS cohorts, we employed similar modeling strategies using maximum likelihood dichotomous logistic models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main GDM subtypes are distinguished by a predominant defect in insulin sensitivity versus a predominant defect in insulin secretion 14 , 28 , 29 . These GDM subtypes have varying clinical characteristics and risks of short-term complications 30 , 31 . Depending on the population, the prevalence of the insulin-deficient subtype ranges between 20 and 30% 14 , 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical pregnancy, there is an increase in the number of pancreatic β cells due to the stimulation of human placental lactogen and prolactin. This leads to elevated levels of insulin[ 14 ].…”
Section: Classification Of Dmmentioning
confidence: 99%