Refining the PoinTER “human firewall” pentesting framework

Abstract

Purpose Penetration tests have become a valuable tool in the cyber security defence strategy in terms of detecting vulnerabilities. Although penetration testing has traditionally focussed on technical aspects, the field has started to realise the importance of the human in the organisation, and the need to ensure that humans are resistant to cyberattacks. To achieve this, some organisations “pentest” their employees, testing their resilience and ability to detect and repel human-targeted attacks. In a previous paper, the authors reported on PoinTER (Prepare TEst Remediate), a human pentesting framework, tailored to the needs of SMEs. This paper aims to propose improvements to refine the framework. The improvements are based on a derived set of ethical principles that have been subjected to ethical scrutiny Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a systematic literature review of academic research, a review of actual hacker techniques, industry recommendations and official body advice related to social engineering techniques. To meet the requirements to have an ethical human pentesting framework, the authors compiled a list of ethical principles from the research literature which they used to filter out techniques deemed unethical. Findings Drawing on social engineering techniques from academic research, reported by the hacker community, industry recommendations and official body advice and subjecting each technique to ethical inspection, using a comprehensive list of ethical principles, the authors propose the refined GDPR-compliant and privacy respecting PoinTER framework. The list of ethical principles, as suggested, could also inform ethical technical pentests. Originality/value Previous work has considered penetration testing humans, but few have produced a comprehensive framework such as PoinTER. PoinTER has been rigorously derived from multiple sources and ethically scrutinised through inspection, using a comprehensive list of ethical principles derived from the research literature.

Offensive Security: Towards Proactive Threat Hunting via Adversary Emulation

“…The summary of literature review is presented in table 1. In our proposed approach we have derived human pentest approach from this research article with title "Refining the PoinTER 'human firewall' pentesting framework" [28] and induced it in adversary emulation process.…”

Implementation of Cybersecurity Situation Awareness Model in Saudi SMEs

“…Cyber-attacks' impact on SMEs can be significant regarding financial losses and reputational damage. A study by [4] found that SMEs in the Netherlands lost an average of £65,000 per cyber-attack. Furthermore, the reputational damage caused by a cyber-attack can be particularly damaging for SMEs, as they may struggle to regain the trust of their customers and partners.…”