2018
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflectance confocal microscopy: a crucial role for actinic keratosis treatment monitoring

Abstract: Linked article: This is a commentary on P. Ishioka et al., pp. 1155–1163 in this issue. To view this article visit https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14716

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RCM enables repeated imaging of the same lesion over time, which can be used for monitoring efficacy of non-invasive treatments. It has demonstrated to be helpful not only in identifying and grading AK lesions, but also in monitoring AK treatment outcomes [35][36][37][38]. In this regard, several studies have been performed with RCM to evaluate the efficacy of field-directed treatments such as 5-fluorouracil [39], ingenol mebutate [40], PDT [41], diclofenac [42], imiquimod [43], and surgery [44].…”
Section: De Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCM enables repeated imaging of the same lesion over time, which can be used for monitoring efficacy of non-invasive treatments. It has demonstrated to be helpful not only in identifying and grading AK lesions, but also in monitoring AK treatment outcomes [35][36][37][38]. In this regard, several studies have been performed with RCM to evaluate the efficacy of field-directed treatments such as 5-fluorouracil [39], ingenol mebutate [40], PDT [41], diclofenac [42], imiquimod [43], and surgery [44].…”
Section: De Junctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AKs are diagnosed by the dermatologist through a clinical exam and the support of portable dermatoscopes, but often this method is not sufficient to ensure that the treatment has been effective or to discriminate between AK and SCC. Non-invasive imaging techniques, such as in vivo confocal laser microscopy [ 12 ] and optical coherence tomography (OCT), can provide complementary information [ 13 ] but require expensive instrumentation and long scanning times. Clinically, dermatologists currently rely on biopsy or excision with histological examination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we postulate that systemic (oral) photoprotection administered in a controlled, systematic manner, increases the efficiency of topical treatment in subjects with severe actinic damage. To address this, we follow up on a combination of clinical parameters, that constitute the basis of easy‐to‐use “photo score”, and microscopic examination of the skin carried out by means of non‐invasive technique (in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM)), for determining intensity of damage and efficacy of the intervention 11 . The hypothesis is that this photo score will improve in subjects receiving protocol‐determined doses of a specific topical sunscreen containing a non‐filtering botanical extract compared to control subjects that use sunscreen ad libitum; and that the addition of a regime of a systemic (oral) photoprotector in addition to the topical regime would improve the photo score even further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%