2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-017-3609-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflectance Spectroscopy (Vis-NIR) for Assessing Soil Heavy Metals Concentrations Determined by two Different Analytical Protocols, Based on ISO 11466 and ISO 14869-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, soil samples from the studied area are analyzed with conventional laboratory measurements. Even these standardized procedures could differ in each study [32,119], as it was observed that laboratory measurements could also entail errors [130] that affect the predictive ability of the models, since they are dependent upon these specific laboratory reference measurements [131]. Laboratory soil spectroscopy has been evaluated for more than twenty years, and despite the development of soil spectral libraries on a global scale, there is still not an agreed upon protocol for performing such measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, soil samples from the studied area are analyzed with conventional laboratory measurements. Even these standardized procedures could differ in each study [32,119], as it was observed that laboratory measurements could also entail errors [130] that affect the predictive ability of the models, since they are dependent upon these specific laboratory reference measurements [131]. Laboratory soil spectroscopy has been evaluated for more than twenty years, and despite the development of soil spectral libraries on a global scale, there is still not an agreed upon protocol for performing such measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another challenge is the lack in comparability between different studies since the model evaluation and accuracy is not measured with the same methods and studies are deprived of certain information that is necessary for the comparison between them. In addition, different protocols for soil sampling and measurements together with different instrumentation are factors that also hinder the reliability of the results, while predictions are affected by the reference method the soil properties were measured [28,108].…”
Section: Future Of Soil Spectroscopy In Soc Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum could also provide valuable information for SOC estimation, considering that soil appears darker with increasing SOC content [27]. Figure 1 shows the spectral signature of a sandy loam soil with 5.43% OC content [28] and the important wavelength regions for SOC estimation according to several studies [29][30][31]. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average value for the Daye area is lower than the first-class standard (the limit for soil quality that protects the natural ecology of the area and maintains the natural background), and the Daye area belongs to the unpolluted area category. The difference between the mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation of the calibration sets and verification sets is small [30,31]. Therefore, this division can be considered as reasonable and can be used for subsequent modeling.…”
Section: Calibration Set and Validation Setmentioning
confidence: 99%