Reflecting on Corporate Governance in South Africa: Lessons Learned and the Way Forward

Abstract

Background: South Africa is a corporate governance pioneer. The King Reports have offered guidance to listed companies in the country since 1994 and unlisted entities since 2016. In the drive for corporate change, attention is increasingly placed on the role of activist shareholders, in particular institutional investors, given the size of their investments. Purpose/objectives: This study aimed to gauge institutional investors’ views on the differences between the King III and IV Reports related to positive aspects and room for improvement. Design/methodology/approach: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with selected institutional investors. Themes were then derived by conducting an interpretive thematic analysis. Findings: Interviewees commended the format and scope of the latest King Report but suggested that outcomes-based training should be offered to directors to ease implementation. Executive remuneration, director independence and auditor independence were highlighted as areas that require attention. Some interviewees questioned whether the current non-binding vote on executive remuneration is sufficient. They suggested that executive remuneration should be tied to performance outcomes across the triple bottom line. Participants recommended that director independence should be considered on a case-by-case basis, instead of strictly applying King IV’s suggested tenure guideline. Furthermore, mandatory audit firm rotation could enhance auditor independence, and hence transparency. Stakeholders are encouraged to demand enhanced transparency on corporate matters to enable more informed decision-making.

Corporate Governance in the South African Public Agencies: Implications for Oversight and Accountability Mechanisms

“…In 1994, King 1 Report was established and a few principles of CG. Later, there was a new version of the second and third reports that developed and refined the principles from the first one to the fourth report [9]. The fourth report summarized all the principles with additional ones that include more stakeholder involvement in IT governance and disclosure.…”

Enhancing governance through blockchain technology in the South African public sector

“…The efficiency of governance structures could be instrumental in aiding sustainable economic development, which could be achieved by the extent to which enterprises publicly adhere to good governance practices (Chigudu 2020). The results of this could lead to sound corporate governance practices which are critical for any country to enhance sustainable economic development (Van Zyl & Mans-Kemp 2001). Thus, this calls for governments to create innovative ways to govern the public sector.…”

The use of non-financial performance metrics in determining directors’ remuneration: The case of listed companies in South Africa

“…According to Van Zyl and Mans-Kemp (2020), directors' remuneration is among the corporate governance areas that needs special attention due to its contribution to corporate scandals in South Africa. At the heart of the debate is the fact that challenges faced by society such as climate change, pandemics, rapid technological challenges, diversity, equity, and inclusivity should be considered by companies and those in charge of governance (Kana, 2020).…”