2017
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflecting on Graphs: Attributes of Graph Choice and Construction Practices in Biology

Abstract: The authors conducted think-aloud interviews to reveal differences in reasoning and graph quality among undergraduate biology students, graduate students, and professors in a pen-and-paper graphing task. Similarities and differences between participant groups and the reasoning that occurred during planning, construction, and reflection phases are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, despite its importance and ubiquity, the use of authentic data in the classroom is limited by the availability of high-quality classroom resources, appropriate instructor training, and research to determine effective teaching strategies for developing student data literacy (Picone et al , 2007; Metz, 2008; Gould et al , 2014; Schultheis and Kjelvik, 2015; Harsh and Schmitt-Harsh, 2016; Angra and Gardner, 2017). We are currently at the beginning of an exciting shift in science education, creating targeted areas for collaboration for science educators, curriculum developers, programmers, and education researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, despite its importance and ubiquity, the use of authentic data in the classroom is limited by the availability of high-quality classroom resources, appropriate instructor training, and research to determine effective teaching strategies for developing student data literacy (Picone et al , 2007; Metz, 2008; Gould et al , 2014; Schultheis and Kjelvik, 2015; Harsh and Schmitt-Harsh, 2016; Angra and Gardner, 2017). We are currently at the beginning of an exciting shift in science education, creating targeted areas for collaboration for science educators, curriculum developers, programmers, and education researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although student data literacy is currently low (Steen, 1999;National Council on Education and the Disciplines, 2001;Wilkins, 2010;Manyika et al, 2011;Oceans of Data Institute, 2014), it can be improved by giving students opportunities to interact with authentic data (Duschl, 1990;Gould et al, 2014;Kastens et al, 2015). This value has been recognized by educators and curriculum reform efforts, which comes at a perfect time to tap into the resources made available through freely available data sets and educational resources (Picone et al, 2007; Metz, 2008; Gould et al, 2014; Schultheis & Kjelvik, 2015;Harsh & Schmitt-Harsh, 2016;Angra & Gardner, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Goldstein and Flynn 2011) Other authors detail the use of inquiry-based learning about statistics in their biology labs (Metz 2008;Thompson et al 2011), illustrating specific examples used in their classrooms. The interpretation of graphs was also of interest, specifically how students and faculty draw conclusions from visual representations of data (Angra and Gardner 2017). A recurring recommendation was to use graphs throughout the entire biology curriculum (Taylor 2010;Angra and Gardner 2017).…”
Section: Statistics Education In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of graphs was also of interest, specifically how students and faculty draw conclusions from visual representations of data (Angra and Gardner 2017). A recurring recommendation was to use graphs throughout the entire biology curriculum (Taylor 2010;Angra and Gardner 2017). A single introductory course was not the only avenue explored for introducing statistics: Colon-Berlingeri and Burrowes (2011) described integrating statistics content into genetics and zoology courses, and Remsburg, Harris, and Batzli (2014) taught statistical content in labs through a two-semester biology sequence.…”
Section: Statistics Education In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%