1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.47.2420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection effect of a localized absorptive potential on nonresonant and resonant tunneling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inasmuch as (−i 0 ) does not represent a matched reflectionless amplifier, the resulting gain is not a monotonically increasing function of 0 . This point has received some attention [27], and can lead to some subtle effects [28]. Also, so far we have introduced randomness in the real part of the dielectric constant only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inasmuch as (−i 0 ) does not represent a matched reflectionless amplifier, the resulting gain is not a monotonically increasing function of 0 . This point has received some attention [27], and can lead to some subtle effects [28]. Also, so far we have introduced randomness in the real part of the dielectric constant only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is better than the optical potential model as it does not suffer from spurious scattering's [9,11,12]. The corrections introduced in case of Optical potential model to take care of spurious scattering's will become manifestly difficult when we calculate the traversal times for a superlattice involving numerous scatterer's.…”
Section: A Wave Attenuation To Measure Conditional Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-spite of the fact that a major problem associated with the optical potential has been cured there still remains the problem that in the strong absorption limit it leads to perfect reflection and absorption without reflection(spurious scattering) is not possible [10,11,12]. To overcome this problem, we instead of making the Hamiltonian non-hermitian, add an exponential factor e −αl to the S-Matrix of the system.…”
Section: B Wave Attenuation As a Model For Dephasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model suffers from some spurious features. 8,9 In the scattering case, in the vicinity of the absorber, the particle experiences a mismatch in the potential ͑being complex͒ and therefore it tries to avoid this region by enhanced back reflection. Thus the IP model plays a dual role of an absorber as well as a reflector, i.e., absorption without reflection is not possible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%