2016
DOI: 10.24195/2414-4665-2016-2-3-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection in Communication Activity of Preschoolers With System Speech Disorders

Abstract: REFLECTION IN COMMUNICATION ACTIVITY OF PRESCHOOLERS WITH SYSTEM SPEECH DISORDERS The article deals with reflexive difficulties in communication activity of senior preschoolers with system speech disorders. The author reviews theoretical background for reflection studies in psychology: from the standpoint of mental processes, intrapersonal formation, multiple processes phenomenon. According to the study reflection is interpreted by the author as a precondition for effective communication, while its deficit is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value contains a recoil contribution and is thus not directly comparable with our item #h20. However, this value has been updated [73] and is now available as two separate values of ∆E HFS str = 6.4435 meV = (6.4085 + 0.0350 recoil ) meV. The first can be compared to Eq.…”
Section: H20 Zemach Term and H23 H23b* H28* Nuclear Recoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This value contains a recoil contribution and is thus not directly comparable with our item #h20. However, this value has been updated [73] and is now available as two separate values of ∆E HFS str = 6.4435 meV = (6.4085 + 0.0350 recoil ) meV. The first can be compared to Eq.…”
Section: H20 Zemach Term and H23 H23b* H28* Nuclear Recoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borie and Karshenboim et al have provided the contributions in this parameterization, whereas Martynenko et al provide the total value in units of energy. However, the value of their coefficients can be obtained by dividing their numbers by r E 2 .The value they used for the charge radius r E is 1.9660 fm 4[73]. In this way the numbers from Martynenko et al can be compared with the ones from the other groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%