2004
DOI: 10.14221/ajte.2004v29n2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection : Journals and Reflective Questions : a Strategy for Professional Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarke (2004) analyzed the reflective journal entries of student-teachers doing an internship program in one university in Sydney and categorized the entries into Dietz model of Professional learning (exploration, organization, connection, and reflection).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clarke (2004) analyzed the reflective journal entries of student-teachers doing an internship program in one university in Sydney and categorized the entries into Dietz model of Professional learning (exploration, organization, connection, and reflection).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2012). Collaborative reflection is considered to be a step further than individual reflection because it involves not only self-inquiry but also an external dialog with others such as the teacher or peers (Clarke, 2003;Hawkes & Romiszowski, 2001) to reach a mutual understanding and build meaningful knowledge together (Yukawa, 2006). The findings of this study showed that the pre-service teachers consider the case story method effective not only in providing opportunities of personal reflection but also in encouraging collaborative reflection between peers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In addition, some researchers have examined practicum supervision and mentoring (Hastings & Squires, 2002;White & Le Cornu, 2002;Yarrow, Millwater, & Foster, 1996), efficacy of in-service TTC's (Yuen-Kwan, 1998), the application of teaching portfolios in TE (Berrill & Addison, 2010), and teachers' reflective practices (Clarke, 2004;McLaughlin & Hanifin, 1995;Risko, Vukelich, & Roskos, 2002;Schön, 1987). Perspectives on teacher evaluation, including the what, whos, and whys of TE (Smith, 2005), alternative paradigms of TE (Zeichner, 1983), teacher expertise (Tsu, 2005), and the knowledge-base of language TE (Freeman & Johnson, 1998 have also been investigated.…”
Section: Language Teacher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%