2016
DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.27.3.13634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection of Industrial Structure in Innovative Capability

Abstract: One of the declared strategic objectives of the European Union is an increase of applied innovations. The article draws attention to the correlation between innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change in the proportion of industrial structure that is driven by technological progress substantially increases labor productivity [26]. Industrial structure rationalization represents the degree of coordination and the degree of resources effectively allocated among different industries under the constraints of productivity level and resources [27]. Industrial structure advancement leads to a "structural deceleration" in the economy, highlighting the important influence of the industrial structure rationalization on the quality of economic development.…”
Section: Industrial Structure and Green Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change in the proportion of industrial structure that is driven by technological progress substantially increases labor productivity [26]. Industrial structure rationalization represents the degree of coordination and the degree of resources effectively allocated among different industries under the constraints of productivity level and resources [27]. Industrial structure advancement leads to a "structural deceleration" in the economy, highlighting the important influence of the industrial structure rationalization on the quality of economic development.…”
Section: Industrial Structure and Green Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have until now focused on: i) the regional innovation process (Rodriguez, 2014); ii) the innovation capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (Dukic et al, 2015) or industrial structure in innovation capacity (Zdrazil et al, 2016); iii) the innovation ecosystem (Jucevicius et al, 2016); iv) open innovation policies (Sekliuckiene et al, 2016); v) the innovation environment and innovation activities of strong, moderate or modest innovators among CEECs (Prokop & Stejskal, 2017); vi) innovative SMEs (Belas et al, 2017); vii) pro-innovation factors (Kraftova & Kraft, 2018); viii) the impact of human resources, research networks, the institutional environment, public or private expenditures on research and development (European Commission, 2019a); or ix) measuring the innovation performance of developed and developing regions (Ghazinoory et al, 2014). Others focused on confirming the impact of formal or informal institutions on innovation performance in various countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the research concerns only ISIC I and uses the tailored model SHADE 3, XXI, 2018 Economics (Kraftová, Matěja, & Zdražil, 2013) to determine the change in the position of the countries compared to the growth dynamics of this sector between 1993 and 2000, resp. 2000 and 2015 and its share of the country's total gross added value, both in 2000 and 2015.…”
Section: Research Sample and Methodology Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%