According to a widely used introductory chemistry text by T. E. Brown et al., 1 chemistry is 'The Central Science'. But scientometric co-citation analyses indicate that biochemistry seems presently to be more interconnected to other sciences. On the other hand, mathematics is considered by many to permeate all sciences and hence might compete as the choice for centrality. A critical commentary and argument leads to a proposal for an alternative partially ordered hierarchical "framework" map of sciences. This argument is supplemented by a scientometric approach based on university course requirements for different curricula, so as to support our partially ordered map. This alternative "framework" mapping then is seen to indicate a special position for chemistry, as where significant branching begins.
Chemistry and scientometric inter-relationsIn order to find an answer to the lead title question, the second question inextricably arises. Thence we here address these two questions, through an examination of several related topics: different proposed inter-relationships amongst the sciences, their partially ordered "framework" hierarchy, the related complementarity of reductionism and emergence, the development of interdisciplinary sciences, trends in the publication of new scientific journals, and points relating to the centrality of chemistry. It is emphasized that the title questions may be answered from two viewpoints -firstly, on