Reflections on 50 years of MCDM: Issues and future research needs

Decision Support System for Program Indonesia Pintar Recipients Using the Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method

“…Based on the analysis, planning and application of the fuzzy multiple criteria system decision-making for advice on determining beneficiaries of Program Indonesia Pintar, several conclusions can be formulated, among others, (1) The advantage of the support system for determining the acceptor determination of the Smart Indonesia Program using a fuzzy multiple criteria decision making procedure is that it can support the user in proposing students who are categorized as students who have the right to accept the support of the Smart Indonesia Program from some of the alternative options available even though the substitutes are have indeterminate data; (2) The results of using the fuzzy multiple criteria decision making method from 5 students obtained the final result with the highest score of 1.932291667, namely Hoiriah deserves to be recommended to receive the Smart Indonesia Program, the variables used in the F-MCDM system can be tried to add, it does not rule out the possibility of using increase the specific variable in order to make recommendations for students who have the right to receive a more specific Smart Indonesia Program.…”

“…Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) has been widely used in a wide range [1]. The PIP Program is a National Program that aims to remove barriers to poor students participating in studying by helping poor students get access to appropriate learning services, avoid dropping out of school, attract poor students to return to study, help students fulfill their desires in upgrading activities, supporting the program Must Practice Lower 9 Years Education (especially to the upper secondary level), and help the smooth running of the school program.…”

MCDM-AHP and PROMETHEE methods integrated for base service strategy vendor evaluation and selection

“…MCDM-AHP is a method that has many assessment criteria [23], [24]. The assessment parameters are seen from a number of criteria that will be used, these criteria as an assessment measuring tool that have different characteristics from the assessment criteria [25], [26]. In general, the criteria used have the same characteristics, that is, the assessment with the highest value is the best, but this is not the case, there are a number of criteria that have the smallest meaning as the best, and some even use both characteristics.…”

MCDM-AHP and ELECTRE collaboration apps for the best vendor selection technique

“…Understanding MCDM provides guidance in determining the level of multi-criteria quality that reflects the experts choices [32] in assessing criteria as an assessment measure in the taxonomy of weighting criteria in normal form. AHP is a ranking method that is usually applied like the hierarchy concept to make it easier to solve problems [33], to make finding solutions simpler.…”