“…120 However, many authors reported that, despite a positive environment, students either appeared less engaged by the end of remote learning or that the students themselves reported a preference for hands-on work over virtual and/or a preference for f2f learning over remote, even if they had p o s i t i v e e x p e r i e n c e s w i t h E R L ( F i g u r e 6). 34,45,48,49,53,67,68,71,[76][77][78]80,83,84,86,92,93,97,106,110,121,125,127 For example, the majority of respondents on a survey (38% response rate) about general chemistry at St. John's University (Staten Island, NY), where students watched videos and did simulations, reported that doing laboratories via videos and simulations produced greater anxiety whereas f2f laboratories produced greater emotional satisfaction and educational growth, despite also rating the remote activities as somewhat effective for learning. 78 For an honors general chemistry course in the fall at Duke University (Durham, NC), responses to a post-lab survey implied that students felt that watching a pre-recorded video of a polymer chemistry experiment increased excitement about doing similar hands-on work in the future.…”