2015
DOI: 10.2140/memocs.2015.3.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on mathematical models of deformation waves in elastic microstructured solids

Abstract: This paper describes the mathematical models derived for wave propagation in solids with internal structure. The focus of the overview is on one-dimensional models which enlarge the classical wave equation by higher-order terms. The crucial parameter in models is the ratio of characteristic lengths of the excitation and the internal structure. Novel approaches based on the concept of internal variables permit one to take the thermodynamical conditions into account directly. Examples of generalisations include … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constitutive parameters s b and r b can be possibly different one from the other and represent respectively the synthesis rate and the resorption rate for given bone tissue. It is not useless to remark that the equation governing the bone mass production or resorption has a structure similar to the equation which is governing the velocity of a phase interface in the theory of phase transition (see, e.g., Abeyaratne and Knowles (2006); Berezovski et al (2008); Engelbrecht and Berezovski (2015); Pietraszkiewicz (2009, 2011)). This circumstance should not surprise too much, however, if one thinks at the deposit mechanism of active cells which has been discussed before.…”
Section: The Evolution Equations For Bone Mass Describing In Remodellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constitutive parameters s b and r b can be possibly different one from the other and represent respectively the synthesis rate and the resorption rate for given bone tissue. It is not useless to remark that the equation governing the bone mass production or resorption has a structure similar to the equation which is governing the velocity of a phase interface in the theory of phase transition (see, e.g., Abeyaratne and Knowles (2006); Berezovski et al (2008); Engelbrecht and Berezovski (2015); Pietraszkiewicz (2009, 2011)). This circumstance should not surprise too much, however, if one thinks at the deposit mechanism of active cells which has been discussed before.…”
Section: The Evolution Equations For Bone Mass Describing In Remodellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we list below some future challenges of this work: Some technical applications require to considering inertia forces since the hypothesis of quasi‐static application of external loads or given displacements is not close enough to describe their behaviour; in these cases, we can follow the guidelines reported in Giorgio et al and Engelbrecht and Berezovski In this paper, we have chosen the stiffness parameters of the model with the only one goal to compare results deriving from different choices of the length scale; nevertheless, we are strongly interested to method capable to relate experiments or measures for identifying the stiffnesses of the proposed model, see, eg, Placidi et al Here, we used the simplest law for the interaction of grains, however, other interaction laws may be used that are able to represent more complex behaviours of packages of grains, see, eg, previous studies …”
Section: Closing Remarks and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Some technical applications require removing the hypothesis of quasistatic application of external loads or given displacements; in these cases we have to consider inertia forces following the suggestions reported in Engelbrecht and Berezovski 2015;Tahaei Yaghoubi et al 2018].…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%