2019
DOI: 10.1002/awwa.1360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on the Lead and Copper Rule and Lead Levels in Flint's Water

Abstract: Key Takeaways After the Flint water crisis, sampling programs were established to assess residential water lead levels. There have been differences in water lead levels for households with lead service lines versus those with copper service lines, and adding phosphate affects water lead levels. Since Flint's return to treated Lake Huron water in 2016, 90th percentile water lead levels have decreased, but they're higher than that reported in 2005–2011.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This work provides information for the ongoing discussion of whether LSL replacement is an effective lead mitigation strategy in the short term, due to its high cost compared to other short-term strategies. 52 Our work indicates that short-term reductions in water lead levels following LSL replacement may not be observed in regions where extensive seeding of lead in in-home plumbing has occurred; however, the beneficial removal of lead sources in the long term is evident from this work as well as from other recent work. 20 These findings must be carefully weighed by utilities and regulators in determining what is best for a community to recover and provide a reliable, safe source of drinking water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This work provides information for the ongoing discussion of whether LSL replacement is an effective lead mitigation strategy in the short term, due to its high cost compared to other short-term strategies. 52 Our work indicates that short-term reductions in water lead levels following LSL replacement may not be observed in regions where extensive seeding of lead in in-home plumbing has occurred; however, the beneficial removal of lead sources in the long term is evident from this work as well as from other recent work. 20 These findings must be carefully weighed by utilities and regulators in determining what is best for a community to recover and provide a reliable, safe source of drinking water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…As illustrated in Figure 2 , more than 50% of the samples surpassed the 10 μg/l provisional guideline set for drinking water. The US EPA claimed that if the Pb concentration exceeded the action level in more than 10% of customer taps sampled, then the entire water system is considered to have exceeded the action level ( US EPA 2015c ; Masten et al., 2019 ). The present data, therefore, showed that the water supply system in Addis Ababa is a concern for its high Pb level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the customer-requested sampling and LCR sampling were analyzed for statistically significant changes in lead concentrations after the introduction of orthophosphate in 2019, which was expected to improve corrosion control. It is important to note that the optimization of orthophosphate dosing can take years, and lead concentrations can continue to decrease after dose optimization. ,, LCR samples and customer-requested samples after the introduction of orthophosphate were expected to be lower, and the 90th percentile concentrations in the LCR data would be expected to be below the EPA action level once corrosion control was optimized. Table , far right column, describes how the available data from each data source were divided into pre- and post-orthophosphate introduction data sets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCR requires samples to be collected at a specific number of single-family homes with known lead service lines (LSL) or suspected indoor lead plumbing/solder (i.e., 100 sites for systems with greater than 100,000 connections). These sites are called Tier I and are expected to represent worst case conditions for the negative effects of corrosion on lead concentrations. , Homes that do not contain lead in plumbing or solder are expected to have lower concentrations even if corrosion control was ineffective and are not sampled to assess the efficacy of corrosion control. Thus, Tier I sites are not intended to represent lead concentrations throughout the system, since many homes may have no lead plumbing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%