Reflections on the ‘Realist Turn’ in Organization and Management Studies

Abstract

This paper has three objectives. First, to provide an exposition of the 'realist turn' in contemporary organization and management studies. Second, to assess the detailed implications of this incipient 'realist turn' for the underlying explanatory principles and practices that should inform organization and management studies as a social scientific field. Third, to evaluate the potential, longer-term, impact of these explanatory principles and practices in an intellectual context where anti-realist ontologies and epistemologies have been dominant. This will entail a critique of contemporary approaches that draw on a social constructionist ontology and a postmodernist epistemology. Overall, the paper concludes that the 'realist turn' creates a significant intellectual opportunity and space in which the historical sociology of dynamic organizational forms and managerial control regimes can be rediscovered and renewed. Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2005.

A quantitative analysis of the impact of a computerised information system on nurses’ clinical practice using a realistic evaluation framework

“…Critical realism has informed the work carried out in different fields: economics, housing organisations, education, evaluation, etc [11,12]. The potential of critical realism is widely recognised in organisational studies [13,14], although it still has few empirical applications. In IT system evaluation research it is still, largely, absent but could be applied to overcome some of the problems with traditional approaches [1,9].…”

Miners, politics and institutional caryatids: Accounting for the transfer of HRM practices in the Brazilian multinational enterprise

“…In some instances, the theory and data fitted together well, while in others they did not. i When the latter occurred, we were pressed to engage in a process of retroduction which entailed 'reasoning backwards' (Reed, 2005;1631) behind the observed outcomes to identify what produced them. As Reed puts it: such a logic of explanation has "to identify and account for the highly complex 'compound effects' of the interactions between, often contradictory and conflicting, powers and influences operating at different levels of analysis and drawn from a wide range of structures and mechanisms operating in dynamic situations and contexts".…”

Organising in the Anthropocene: an ontological outline for ecocentric theorising

“…The field of organisation studies has undergone several intellectual redirections or turns within its relatively short history (Reed, 2005). Some of these turns have dealt with the means of acquiring and analysing data, while others have focused more on the assumptions related to the nature of knowledge and reality, or ontology.…”

“…And what follows the irreducibility and non-substitutability of objects is the quality of uniqueness. The uniqueness of objects directs scholars away from any reductionist mode of organisation studies towards more inclusive frameworks (see e.g., Purser et al, 1995;Reed, 2005;Lozano, 2008), and guides them to proceed with caution when organising and managing objects, as well as encouraging respect for the exceptionality of all objects.…”