2018
DOI: 10.1111/risa.13139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on the Use of Conceptual Research in Risk Analysis

Abstract: A risk analysis science is developing, characterized by knowledge generation on concepts, principles, theories, frameworks, methods, and models, for understanding, assessing, characterizing, communicating, and managing risk (for short referred to as conceptual knowledge generation in risk analysis), as well as supporting risk knowledge generation of specific activities based on these concepts, principles, theories, frameworks, methods, and models. The scientific knowledge generation is based on different types… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the means of advancing risk analysis science is often conceptual research (Aven, 2018a), where focus is on reasoning and argumentation, this research typically also has an empirical basis and is inspired by trends in risk problems addressed by applied risk analysis. In the following, we provide two examples of how relatively recent changes in society and developments in other sciences have influenced and led to developments in generic risk analysis.…”
Section: Current Developments and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the means of advancing risk analysis science is often conceptual research (Aven, 2018a), where focus is on reasoning and argumentation, this research typically also has an empirical basis and is inspired by trends in risk problems addressed by applied risk analysis. In the following, we provide two examples of how relatively recent changes in society and developments in other sciences have influenced and led to developments in generic risk analysis.…”
Section: Current Developments and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk science is using different types of research, as described in Aven (2018b), both empirical and conceptual. Example 1 on the precautionary principle is very much an illustration of conceptual research, whereas Example 2 is mainly empirical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good illustration of this is classifications of scientific areas, as used for example in research funding schemes, where risk science is not included (Hansson & Aven 2014). In recent years, considerable work has been conducted to clarify the scope and foundation of the risk science (e.g., SRA, 2015a, 2015b, 2017a, 2017b; Aven, 2018a,b; 2020a), but communication concerning this issue at scientific conferences and in various risk societies (such as SRA and ESRA—European Safety and Reliability Association) has convinced the present author that more work is needed to explain what this science is about and what it adds, compared to other disciplines. Theoretical work highlighting rationale and argumentation is important, but often concrete examples can be more informative and convincing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content was then analysed using content analysis approach as suggested by Neema et al [4] and Lavaei et al [29], among others. This study particularly used the Conceptual analysis [30,31] to Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 2 September 2019 doi:10.20944/preprints201909.0022.v1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%