2010
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01133.2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflexive Limb Selection and Control of Reach Direction to Moving Targets in Cats, Monkeys, and Humans

Abstract: Perfiliev S, Isa T, Johnels B, Steg G, Wessberg J. Reflexive limb selection and control of reach direction to moving targets in cats, monkeys, and humans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During training, monkeys showed short RTs immediately upon encountering moving targets in the quasi-112 automatic context. This observation is consistent with the suggestion that moving targets evoke intercepting 113 movements with an almost innate short latency 26 . For this reason, we refer to such reaches as 'quasi-114 automatic'.…”
Section: Reaction Times 83supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During training, monkeys showed short RTs immediately upon encountering moving targets in the quasi-112 automatic context. This observation is consistent with the suggestion that moving targets evoke intercepting 113 movements with an almost innate short latency 26 . For this reason, we refer to such reaches as 'quasi-114 automatic'.…”
Section: Reaction Times 83supporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, 60the temporal flexibility of that process is considerable; it can arise well before movement onset, but can also 61 consume surprisingly little time. In agreement with 24,26 , such brevity argues against the idea that movement 62 preparation necessarily involves time-consuming cognitive or high-level planning processes. It is more likely 63 that preparatory activity plays a straightforward and mechanistic role: initializing the circuits that are about to 64 produce descending movement commands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Still, the planning of ballistic elbow movements remained functional. This suggests that there is enough redundancy in the nervous system to effectively compensate for cortical loss following stroke, or that additional structures, such as the regions of the tectum that contribute to rapid coordination of eye and hand movements [49], are significantly involved in the planning process. Without specific lesion data, it is not possible to differentiate between these two hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional significance of the SLR In humans, involuntary corrective muscle responses can occur within 80-100 ms of a visual perturbation or a jump in target location (Saijo et al, 2005;Fautrelle et al, 2010;Perfiliev et al, 2010), and these fast corrections are dissociable from slower, voluntary corrections (Day & Brown, 2001). The fast online correction is mediated by a spinal circuit that modulates ongoing corticospinal drive, and it is abolished by lesions in the reticulospinal tract (Alstermark et al, 1990;Pettersson et al, 1997;Pettersson & Perfiliev, 2002).…”
Section: Linking Physiological Tremor To Sensorimotor Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%