2010
DOI: 10.1080/13642531003746857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research (second edition), by Mats Alvesson and Kaj Sköldberg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
169
0
20

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
169
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflective practice was not only integral to credibility, rigour and transparency within this research, but is an ethical imperative [34]. The Alvesson and Skölberg [35] model was utilised to offer a framework for reflective practice. Reflective memo writing occurred throughout the process to enable awareness of personal preconceptions, bolster credibility and supplement analysis [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflective practice was not only integral to credibility, rigour and transparency within this research, but is an ethical imperative [34]. The Alvesson and Skölberg [35] model was utilised to offer a framework for reflective practice. Reflective memo writing occurred throughout the process to enable awareness of personal preconceptions, bolster credibility and supplement analysis [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the recorded and transcribed material and notes as the primary data sources. The interviews were coded in an iterative process, creating affinity diagrams through a grounded approach using open codes, concepts, and then themes and aggregate dimensions (Gioia et al, 2013) applying a reflexive mind-set (Alvesson and Skoldberg, 2009). Figure 6 presents examples of the coding process.…”
Section: Coding and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage of coding we iterated between ways of organizing into second order constructs among the four authors, iterating with the literature, as proposed by Gioia et al, (2013), within the fields of PRM, product development, and general RM, in order to identify relevant concepts for understanding the perceptions of the value creation of PRM (the literature is presented in section 2). Through iterating with the literature in an inductive-deductive, or abductive reasoning process (Alvesson and Skoldberg, 2009;Gioia et al, 2013), we found that the value perceptions could be interpreted to generally fall into categories of outcomes such as strategic value, project level value and more "process-oriented value", which cover the effectiveness of activities or process attributes, rather than outcomes. From there, we identified value creation as aggregate dimensions for the top-level themes, categorized into the content and process of value creation, which formed the basis of the literature review and the model presented in section 2 (Figures 2, 3, and 4).…”
Section: Coding and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms “reflexive” and “reflection” are largely used synonymously in the literature, with notable exceptions such as Mats Alvesson and Kaj Sköldberg (2000). Reflective practice may be considered an awareness of our actions brought about by differences that happen spontaneously or purposefully explored (Ragland 2006) and aim to “foster an analytic attitude” (Brown 2006).…”
Section: Research Designs For the Generation Of Policy‐relevant Informentioning
confidence: 99%