2015
DOI: 10.1177/160940691501400103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflexivity on an Empirical Study about Cancer Patients' Perception of Good Caring in Light of Goffman's Theory

Abstract: Findings from an empirical, qualitative study conducted by the first author regarding cancer patients' perceptions of good nursing care have previously been published. In this article, the entire research process of the study is analyzed and discussed in light of the social theories of Erving Goffman (1959Goffman ( , 1986, arriving at some complementary interpretations of the findings. Reflections are made specifically based on his theories concerning the interactional frames and the presentation of self in ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study's limitations are that the findings from qualitative studies cannot be generalised, and that illness narratives are not objective truths but represent the truth of the telling (there and then). The narrators choose what they want to tell, whom they trust and how they prefer to present themselves (Goffman, ; Kvåle, Synnes, & Jacobsen, ), and therefore we cannot exclude the possibility that some wanted to present themselves as strong persons who were in control of the situation even if they had a hard time. A possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded, given that the sampling was purposive and not randomised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study's limitations are that the findings from qualitative studies cannot be generalised, and that illness narratives are not objective truths but represent the truth of the telling (there and then). The narrators choose what they want to tell, whom they trust and how they prefer to present themselves (Goffman, ; Kvåle, Synnes, & Jacobsen, ), and therefore we cannot exclude the possibility that some wanted to present themselves as strong persons who were in control of the situation even if they had a hard time. A possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded, given that the sampling was purposive and not randomised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In qualitative research, reflections are mostly based on interactional setting in which interviewer and respondent conduct the interview from different perspectives, with different expectations and objectives, having different social roles, theoretical backgrounds, and positions [ 26 ]. These differences certainly influence the interaction in the interview situation making researcher’s positionality pivotal in qualitative research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limitations of the method are based on illness narratives not always being the objective truths but representing the truth of the telling (there and then) . Also, a possibility of selection bias cannot be excluded, given that the sampling was purposive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%