2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-020-09523-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refocusing loyalty programs in the era of big data: a societal lens paradigm

Abstract: Big data and technological change have enabled loyalty programs to become more prevalent and complex. How these developments influence society has been overlooked, both in academic research and in practice. We argue why this issue is important and propose a framework to refocus loyalty programs in the era of big data through a societal lens. We focus on three aspects of the societal lens-inequality, privacy, and sustainability. We discuss how loyalty programs in the big data era impact each of these societal f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Moon (2000) argued, reciprocal dialogues emerge first and foremost in one-to-one customer-company exchanges. Extant research and meta-analyses exist on the “one-to-many” or cumulative rewards such as loyalty programs (for extensive overviews see Kumar and Shah, 2004; Otto et al , 2020; Palmatier et al , 2006; Stourm et al , 2020; Watson et al , 2015) and their effectiveness for customer metrics, such as share-of-wallet or profitability. This study adds to relationship marketing literature by showing that situational customer spending can be triggered by dynamic, reciprocal exchanges between the customer and the company (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Moon (2000) argued, reciprocal dialogues emerge first and foremost in one-to-one customer-company exchanges. Extant research and meta-analyses exist on the “one-to-many” or cumulative rewards such as loyalty programs (for extensive overviews see Kumar and Shah, 2004; Otto et al , 2020; Palmatier et al , 2006; Stourm et al , 2020; Watson et al , 2015) and their effectiveness for customer metrics, such as share-of-wallet or profitability. This study adds to relationship marketing literature by showing that situational customer spending can be triggered by dynamic, reciprocal exchanges between the customer and the company (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some companies cannot or do not want to launch loyalty programs though as these programs often fail to perform as expected (Bombaij and Dekimpe, 2020;Wang and Lalwani, 2019). Loyalty programs have also been criticized to potentially infringe on customer privacy (Stourm et al, 2020). Different to such institutionalized programs, this study explores alternatives for rewarding customers understanding that customer-company relationships involve social exchanges based on reciprocity (Henderson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Loyal Customers' Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital marketing has opened many opportunities for B2B marketers; however, scholarly research in this area is still at the embryonic stage (Vieira et al, 2019). Online schemes capture detailed customer information through various interactions across all channels -also known as big data (Stourm et al, 2020), through the integration of intelligent analytics and communication technology (Saura et al, 2017). Apart from interactive tools to connect with consumers (Chaffey & Smith, 2017), big data helps generate precise insights reflecting customers' behaviour (Pandey & Gudipudi, 2019).…”
Section: Loyalty Programmes In Digital Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urgency of this research is that loyalty programs in banking need to look at the dynamics of female consumers, especially when digital businesses dominate marketing transactions. Big data and technological change have made loyalty programs more common and complex (Stourm et al, 2020). Even though there is a potentially harmful effect on loyalty programs (Baker and Legendre, 2021), and this study is still fragmented, quite a lot has been studied (Kim et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%