2005
DOI: 10.1177/105678790501400103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reform in the Curriculum of Basic Education in the People's Republic of China: Pedagogy, Application, and Learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Confucian tradition and contemporary policy place considerable value on high examination scores for both students and teachers (Li 2009;Min 1997;Wang 1996). Nonetheless, the government of China has recently called for assessment reforms that move evaluation systems away from transmission and memorisation of 'bookish' knowledge for purely ranking or selection purposes towards more formative, authentic and humanistic approaches to assessment (OECD 2011) including the introduction of integrated quality assessment which emphasises judging students' personal character (Liu and Qi 2005;Ministry of Education 2005). However, as Wang (1996) made clear, concern for all-round development of good character and good person attributes has been a priority in modern China's curriculum since the mid-1950s' focus on the 'Three Goods' (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Confucian tradition and contemporary policy place considerable value on high examination scores for both students and teachers (Li 2009;Min 1997;Wang 1996). Nonetheless, the government of China has recently called for assessment reforms that move evaluation systems away from transmission and memorisation of 'bookish' knowledge for purely ranking or selection purposes towards more formative, authentic and humanistic approaches to assessment (OECD 2011) including the introduction of integrated quality assessment which emphasises judging students' personal character (Liu and Qi 2005;Ministry of Education 2005). However, as Wang (1996) made clear, concern for all-round development of good character and good person attributes has been a priority in modern China's curriculum since the mid-1950s' focus on the 'Three Goods' (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Liu and Qi (2005), this reform required major changes in Chinese schools. The reforms emphasized curriculum content, student understanding, and application of concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reforms emphasized curriculum content, student understanding, and application of concepts. In classrooms, special attention was aimed at each Chinese teacher's use of varied teaching and learning methods and his or her application of a variety of assessment modes (Liu & Qi, 2005). There was intense pressure to cater to individual differences and to promote generic skill development and high-order thinking over rote learning (Zhong & Cui, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers and students in basic education were required to change to the new curriculum framework and textbooks by -2005(Liu & Qi, 2005. This new curriculum had four basic features: interactive, integrated, diverse, and situated (Huang, 2004;Liu & Qi, 2005). It was designed to encourage students to have enquiring minds and to develop problem-solving abilities.…”
Section: Background: Current Curriculum Reform In China (Erjikegai)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It aimed at equipping students with the necessary skills to learn how to learn. Acquiring research skills, inquiry skills, and information processing and reasoning skills are key issues, plus helping students achieve self actualisation through 'learning by experiencing' (Huang, 2004;Liu & Qi, 2005;Sargent, 2009).…”
Section: Background: Current Curriculum Reform In China (Erjikegai)mentioning
confidence: 99%