1961
DOI: 10.2307/838946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reform of Civil Law in Hungary, Poland, and the Soviet Union

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Still, the 1964 Civil Code adopted a rather reserved attitude towards both personal rights protection and compensation for non-proprietary damage. It follows from the explanatory memorandum to it that a court ought to preferably 28 Oliphant, Pinghua and Lei (2018) 30-34. 29 Damm (2002) Rudzinski (1956) 216-43. 33 Grzybowski (1961) 253-65. 34 Coogan et al (1997) 495-508. compensate non-proprietary damage in immaterial form, such as in the form of a statement (possibly published in the daily press).…”
Section: The Influence Of Natural Law Theory On Private Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Still, the 1964 Civil Code adopted a rather reserved attitude towards both personal rights protection and compensation for non-proprietary damage. It follows from the explanatory memorandum to it that a court ought to preferably 28 Oliphant, Pinghua and Lei (2018) 30-34. 29 Damm (2002) Rudzinski (1956) 216-43. 33 Grzybowski (1961) 253-65. 34 Coogan et al (1997) 495-508. compensate non-proprietary damage in immaterial form, such as in the form of a statement (possibly published in the daily press).…”
Section: The Influence Of Natural Law Theory On Private Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the CC was a definitely 69 For early foreign academic comments on the 1959 code see Léh 1960;Grzybowski 1961. 4.3.1, socialist codifications were justified by arguments about a fundamental difference between bourgeois and socialist law.…”
Section: The 1959 Civil Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provisions seem more or less casuistic, and are rooted in Roman law, with the exception of liability for risk in unsafe work environments, which is naturally unknown in antique laws. Certain legal institutions under Roman law, including receptum nautarum cauponum et stabulariorum, actio de deiectis vel effusis and actio de positis vel suspensis, were actually transposed in the regulations on increased liability by hotels and restaurants and on liability for damaged to buildings (Mihály, 1959;Grzybowski, 1961;Fesztl and Tamás, 1967;Eörsi, 1974;Gabor, 1982, Vékás, 1987.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%