2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2179474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reforming Public Financial Management Systems in Developing Countries as a Contribution to the Improvement of Governance

Abstract: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies suggest that the use of RBA, i.e. the disbursement of external investments in the forms of grants or loans once predetermined results have been achieved and verified, can have positive influences on state-society accountability relations by incentivising effective public service delivery (Klingebiel 2012). Similar to other forms of earmarking through development cooperation, a potential disadvantage is that it can distort a developing-country government's public sector by making it prioritise RBA-funded results over those that are not (Klingebiel 2012, 15).…”
Section: Box 1: Capacity Development and Results-based Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggest that the use of RBA, i.e. the disbursement of external investments in the forms of grants or loans once predetermined results have been achieved and verified, can have positive influences on state-society accountability relations by incentivising effective public service delivery (Klingebiel 2012). Similar to other forms of earmarking through development cooperation, a potential disadvantage is that it can distort a developing-country government's public sector by making it prioritise RBA-funded results over those that are not (Klingebiel 2012, 15).…”
Section: Box 1: Capacity Development and Results-based Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessment framework has established itself as an internationally renowned analytical tool (see Klingebiel / Mahn 2011). Being a standardised approach, PEFA enables an overview of trends to be obtained at comparable intervals on the basis of 28 indicators.…”
Section: Public Financial Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%