2016
DOI: 10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland

Abstract: This article explores the discourses surrounding the act of writing Section 10 Bilingual education in the new Finnish national core curriculum, which will be implemented in 2016.This section will set the parameters for programs that integrate language and content learning, where a minimum of two languages are used for instruction in content subjects. The main research questions discussed in this article are how and why certain discourses are expressed, or left unexpressed, in the final draft version of the cur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 10 of the Finnish Basic Education Act (Ministry of Education, 1998) states that instruction provided through a foreign language may be done partly or entirely, so long as it does not obstruct pupils' ability to follow teaching. Bergroth (2016) clarifies that the Finnish core curriculum is an administrative, intellectual and pedagogical document following a backward design, whereby learning objectives are stipulated in educational policy and then interpreted, developed and implemented by educational providers and teachers, taking into account local needs. However, there are no prescribed or recommended teaching methods for bilingual education or any restrictive definition of it.…”
Section: Context For the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section 10 of the Finnish Basic Education Act (Ministry of Education, 1998) states that instruction provided through a foreign language may be done partly or entirely, so long as it does not obstruct pupils' ability to follow teaching. Bergroth (2016) clarifies that the Finnish core curriculum is an administrative, intellectual and pedagogical document following a backward design, whereby learning objectives are stipulated in educational policy and then interpreted, developed and implemented by educational providers and teachers, taking into account local needs. However, there are no prescribed or recommended teaching methods for bilingual education or any restrictive definition of it.…”
Section: Context For the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…large-or small-scale programmes where respectively 25% of the curriculum or less is taught in the target language). With no official bilingual schools and bilingual education being intertwined with general language education (Bergroth 2016), CLIL implementation is versatile and potentially vulnerable, despite common objectives and shared principles. However, for Finnish CLIL to be able to make the most of this opportunity, it is important to understand what teachers need to be able to succeed in CLIL teaching.…”
Section: Context For the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the Finland curriculum outlines the learning objectives stipulated in educational policy, it is educational providers and teachers that implement the curriculum in response to local needs. This reflects the value placed on teacher autonomy and local decision-making in Finland (Bergroth, 2016).…”
Section: Fl Teacher Education and Fl Teachingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The local development of multilingual approaches has led to a variety of small-scale experiments and even educational programmes addressing various students' linguistic backgrounds across diverse social and educational contexts (Barwell et al, 2016;Busch, 2011;Reljić et al, 2015;Sierens and Van Avermaet, 2017). In many EU countries, content and language integrated learning (CLIL), additive language immersion education and bilingual education targeting dominant languages have been set up to promote multilingual learning (Bergroth, 2016;Cenoz et al, 2014;Hélot and Cavalli, 2017;Nikula, 2017). However, they tend to be educational programmes or approaches that caretakers can opt for, and ideally, teachers should have received at least some specialised training for this type of teaching.…”
Section: Identifying Ideological and Implementational Spaces In Itementioning
confidence: 99%