2021
DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reforming the World Trade Organization: Practitioner Perspectives from China, the EU, and the US

Abstract: China, the European Union, and the United States are the world's largest traders. They have a big stake in a multilateral system of rules to manage the inevitable frictions among interdependent economies organized on different principles. This paper discusses elements of the WTO reform agenda through the lens of positions taken by these three WTO members, identifying the extent of alignment on key subjects, including transparency, dispute settlement, and plurilateral negotiations. We draw on findings of a rece… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They have a big stake in a multilateral and bilateral system of rules (Hoekman and Wolfe, 2021). The relationship between the US and China is strained at the moment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have a big stake in a multilateral and bilateral system of rules (Hoekman and Wolfe, 2021). The relationship between the US and China is strained at the moment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would even argue that seen from the economic power perspective, the CBAM is part of a broader discussion on climate governance. It is about the potential need for reform of the WTO in accordance with climate policy objectives, which will require the support of 'key players' but will likely also require a revision of established rules of the game (Bacchus, 2018(Bacchus, , 2022Hoekman and Wolfe, 2021).…”
Section: The Economic Power Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also argued that SOEs can be used to indirectly subsidize downstream industries in both domestic and export markets through below-market pricing for their goods and services (Hoekman and Sapir, 2021). In this regard the lack of specific SOE-related disciplines under the SCM Agreement, including the absence of an agreed definition, is triggering discussions not only on the alleged distortions caused by SOEs but also about the lack of transparency of their operations and their trade impacts (Hoekman and Wolfe 2021).…”
Section: Some Economies Consider Soes As An Essential Element Of Thei...mentioning
confidence: 99%