Reforming Women in the United States and Aotearoa/New Zealand: A Comparative Ethnography of Welfare Reform in Global Context

Abstract

Historically, the United States and Aotearoa/New Zealand symbolize opposite poles of an individualist‐collectivist welfare state continuum. Until recently, Aotearoa/New Zealand was known as a "cradle‐to‐grave" welfare state, with "universal" employment and coverage in health and education. U.S. history, in contrast, is marked by an unabashed individualism and a residualist approach to welfare. Recent neoliberal reforms, however, have engendered a convergence between the two countries in the conceptualization and organization of assistance for poor single mothers. Most notable are the "workfare" provisions of legislative changes made in 1996 in the two countries, which work to reconstitute poor mothers as potential able‐bodied workers. In this article we analyze welfare reform in the United States and Aotearoa/New Zealand, with particular reference to how poor single mothers respond to, comply and cope with, or resist neoliberal strategies. Analysis is based on participant‐observation, interviews, and focus groups conducted between 1989 and 1999. [welfare reform, neoliberalism, globalization, gender, the United States, Aotearoa/New Zealand]

Providers and Staff Respond to Medicaid Managed Care: The Unintended Consequences of Reform in New Mexico

“…Anthropologists have already examined neoliberal policies in the area of welfare reform and health care reform at a broader level. In this special issue, we focus on MMC and bring to this set of changes the kind of ethnographic insight that has characterized the anthropological literature on welfare reform (Kingfisher and Goldsmith 2001;Morgen 2001;Morgen and Maskovsky 2003;Newman 2001).…”

The Global Context of Vaccine Refusal: Insights from a Systematic Comparative Ethnography of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative

“…Recent comparative ethnographies relying on in‐depth research pull together data from several ethnographic studies, conducted using somewhat different methodologies (Hodgson ; Kingfisher and Goldsmith ;Whyte ). The comparative aspect of the project is usually not built into the design but is rather a product of shared interest by researchers working across different field sites.…”

Writing against identity politics: An essay on gender, race, and bureaucratic pain

“…Rarely is the role of bureaucracy itself examined as an inflictor of pain on welfare mothers. Also rare and limited in scope is ethnographic literature about single mothers outside North America and Western Europe (Carey 1993; Kingfisher and Goldsmith 2001; Lockhart 2008; Parmar and Rohner 2005; see McClaurin 1998). This essay conceives single mothers’ repeated journeys of torture through long lines at government bureaus as divine peregrinations with their own cosmological order 32…”