2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019wr026732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reformulation of Bayesian Geostatistical Approach on Principal Components

Abstract: In this note, we reformulate Bayesian geostatistical inverse approach based on principal component analysis of the spatially correlated parameter field to be estimated. The unknown parameter field is described by a latent-variable model as a realization of projections on its principal component axes. The reformulated geostatistical approach (RGA) achieves substantial dimensionality reduction by estimating the latent variable of projections on truncated principal components instead of directly estimating the pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be complete, the following presents a brief review of the reformulated geostatistical approach (RGA) for estimating the projections or coefficients on dominant principal axes for large-scale spatial fields (Zhao & Luo, 2020). The general observation equation describing the relationship between data or dependent variables and target parameters is given by…”
Section: Brief Overview Of Reformulated Geostatistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be complete, the following presents a brief review of the reformulated geostatistical approach (RGA) for estimating the projections or coefficients on dominant principal axes for large-scale spatial fields (Zhao & Luo, 2020). The general observation equation describing the relationship between data or dependent variables and target parameters is given by…”
Section: Brief Overview Of Reformulated Geostatistical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EQUATION represents a significant dimension reduction by transforming the estimation of s to the estimation of the latent‐variables α or the projection of s on k retained principal axes, where k is typically less than 100. The reformulated approach is to minimize the negative logarithm of the posterior distribution, p(α,β) (Zhao & Luo, 2020): minα,βf(α,β)=minα,β{12(yh(α,β))TR1(yh(α,β))+12αTα} …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rearranging Equation leads to: [leftHαjTR1Hαj+IHαjTR1HβjleftHβjTR1HαjHβjTR1Hβj][leftleftαj+1leftβj+1]=[leftleftHαjTR1(yh(αj,βj)+Hαjαj+Hβjβj)leftHβjTR1(yh(αj,βj)+Hαjαj+Hβjβj)] which yields the same formula as the Gauss‐Newton method for solving the nonlinear equations (Zhao & Luo, 2020). The approach was named as “Reformulated Geostatistical Approach” (RGA) because the random process assumes the typical geostatistical structure, the framework is the same as the Bayesian geostatistical approach, and Equation can be conveniently related to classic geostatistical formulas such as cokriging equations (Zhao & Luo, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations