1987
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/20/22/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reformulation of the theory of the mass shift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The mass shift between two isotopes A and A ′ , caused by the motion of nucleus with the finite mass, is expressed as [18,19] …”
Section: Isotope Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mass shift between two isotopes A and A ′ , caused by the motion of nucleus with the finite mass, is expressed as [18,19] …”
Section: Isotope Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasized that the relativistic correction to the mass shift operator [18,20,21,19,17] are rather small (less than 1%) for Ne I and were systematically omitted in the present work.…”
Section: Isotope Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method of evaluation proved to be unreliable even in the non-relativistic case, as pointed out in Ref. [3].…”
Section: A Mass Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMS correction is given by the expectation value of the R ij operator for i = j, i R ii , while the SMS correction can be obtained from the i = j terms, i =j R ij , treating the two terms on equal footage [3]. The full relativistic theory of the nuclear recoil effect can only be formulated in the framework of QED, see [6,7].…”
Section: A Mass Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relativistic effects are expected to increase with the nuclear charge while the mass shift contribution should become less significant. Shabaev and Artemyev [6] and, in an independent way, Palmer [7], derived these relativistic corrections to the mass shift. Since then several papers have shown the importance of such relativistic effects to the isotope shift [1,2,3,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%