“…A second fact is the need to employ data in the theoretical formulas that are not known preoperatively. When one uses the preoperative axial length, corneal curvature and a standard depth for the anterior chamber, one ignores the fact that the postoperative axial length might be shorter [10,11] or longer [12]; the postopera tive cornea flatter [3,13,14] orsteeper [ll, 15] and the anterior chamber will not always have the assumed standard depth [3,11,13,16], All these parameters depend on the geometry of the eyeball, as well as on the experience and skill of the implant surgeon. Finally systematic errors may be caused by the assumptions on the effective thickness of the retina [3.11.14,15] and the sound veloc ity of the media [14], As long as no communis opinio is at tained on these matters, the alternative for mula suggested by Sanders, Retilaff and Kraff:…”