2013
DOI: 10.1177/0161734613510287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refraction Correction in 3D Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging

Abstract: We present the first correction of refraction in three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging using an iterative approach that traces propagation paths through a two-layer planar tissue model, applying Snell’s law in 3D. This approach is applied to real-time 3D transcranial ultrasound imaging by precomputing delays offline for several skull thicknesses, allowing the user to switch between three sets of delays for phased array imaging at the push of a button. Simulations indicate that refraction correction may be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A synthetic aperture imaging (SAI) scheme is used as the transmission of spherical wave fronts facilitates the modeling of refraction (necessary for an accurate phase correction) and provides dynamic focusing in transmission [57]. As explained in [58], modeling the wave propagation through the skull and considering a bone layer with a finite irregular thickness enable the calculation of a unique set of forward and backward travel times, at each pixel, for each transmit beam and for each array element (in receive). As a consequence, we expect our approach to overcome the limitations of nearfield phase-screen methods, in particular, because the concept of isoplanatic patch does not exist in our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A synthetic aperture imaging (SAI) scheme is used as the transmission of spherical wave fronts facilitates the modeling of refraction (necessary for an accurate phase correction) and provides dynamic focusing in transmission [57]. As explained in [58], modeling the wave propagation through the skull and considering a bone layer with a finite irregular thickness enable the calculation of a unique set of forward and backward travel times, at each pixel, for each transmit beam and for each array element (in receive). As a consequence, we expect our approach to overcome the limitations of nearfield phase-screen methods, in particular, because the concept of isoplanatic patch does not exist in our approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of using ultrasound in the human brain, in imaging and in therapy, the biggest challenge is ultrasonic propagation through the skull. The heterogeneous nature of the human skull bone at a microscopic level, causes considerable distortion of the ultrasonic beam, in the form of resolution compromising reverberations, refraction [22], multiple scattering, reflection between bone and tissue interfaces and mode conversion wth the three latter being the main sources of attenuation [23], while absorption plays a secondary role at the higher frequencies used in imaging [24]. More specifically, the skull thickness, density and equivalent sound velocity tend to vary across the length of the transducer causing phase aberration of the wavefront.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ultrasound imaging, speed-of-sound effects [ 12 , 13 ] and refractive effects have been known to distort the reconstructed geometry, and iterative approaches have been developed to reverse the curvature of ultrasound waves as described by Snell’s law [ 14 , 15 ]. Recently, such corrections have been applied to regions of the body known to harbor strong gradients in refraction index, like the cranium [ 16 ] and the breast [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%