2016
DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0410822062016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive error and associated risk factors in 6-12 years school children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study revealed that 22.5% of the children had clinically significant refractive error. However, this prevalence was higher than the rates observed in a study of schoolchildren in India 31 (5.46% in an urban area and 2.63% in a rural area) and in another study of schoolchildren in India 36 (17.5% in an urban area and 12% in a rural area). Differences in the refractive error threshold might have led to the variability in refractive error prevalence among studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The present study revealed that 22.5% of the children had clinically significant refractive error. However, this prevalence was higher than the rates observed in a study of schoolchildren in India 31 (5.46% in an urban area and 2.63% in a rural area) and in another study of schoolchildren in India 36 (17.5% in an urban area and 12% in a rural area). Differences in the refractive error threshold might have led to the variability in refractive error prevalence among studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Other studies conducted in different part of India did not found significant difference in the prevalence of refractive errors between gender. 16,20 A study done in India also found statistically significant association between refractive errors and age groups 16 while another study didn't observed statistically significant association between refractive errors and age groups. 17 One study done in Uttar Pradesh, India also not found the significant association with positive family history 23 whereas another study conducted in Bangalore, India found a very strong relationship between refractive errors and hereditary or familial factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similarly, the different studies also observed that maximum number of participants were from urban than rural area. 9,13,17,20 One study found more participants from the rural area. 15 The children living in urban areas have to do lot of near work activities and also the duration of outdoor games was less as compared to children from rural areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other similar studies conducted so far, this finding was consistent 26,27 and inconsistent with other studies conducted in different study settings. 26,28,29 The observed variation could partly be explained by the differences in study setting, sample size, and age category of children included in the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These included being female, being in the age group of 10-13 years, history of spectacle use by both parents, distance of TV watching, duration of TV watching, duration of computer/mobile games, watching television for 2-4 hrs/ day, watching television at <1 m, watching television at 1-2 m, mobile exposure for 2-4 hrs/day, mobile exposure for >4 hrs/day, medical visit while experiencing symptoms and no medical visit experience and outdoor playing. 28,30 The only variable that showed significant association with VI was the parents'/guardians' awareness status about VI in their children. Accordingly, parents/guardians being unaware of VI in their children were more likely to develop VI in their children compared to parents who were aware about VI in their children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%