2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive Errors in a Rural Chinese Adult PopulationThe Handan Eye Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
170
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
16
170
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The prevalence of myopia (SE o À 0.5 D) in rural adult Koreans was 20.5%. This was similar to the prevalence found in population-based studies of rural Chinese (18.8%), 10,13 but lower than that observed in populationbased studies of urban Chinese (32.3%), 12 Singapore Chinese (35.0%) 7 and Japanese (41.8%), 11 and higher than that found in a Mongolian population-based sample (17.2%). 9 The prevalence of hyperopia (SE 4 þ 0.5 D) in our study sample was 41.8%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…11 The prevalence of myopia (SE o À 0.5 D) in rural adult Koreans was 20.5%. This was similar to the prevalence found in population-based studies of rural Chinese (18.8%), 10,13 but lower than that observed in populationbased studies of urban Chinese (32.3%), 12 Singapore Chinese (35.0%) 7 and Japanese (41.8%), 11 and higher than that found in a Mongolian population-based sample (17.2%). 9 The prevalence of hyperopia (SE 4 þ 0.5 D) in our study sample was 41.8%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…9 The prevalence of hyperopia (SE 4 þ 0.5 D) in our study sample was 41.8%. This was higher than the prevalence figures reported in rural Chinese (20.0 À 23.1%), 10,13 Indonesians (32.1%), 8 Mongolians (32.9%) 9 and Japanese (27.9%), 11 and similar to those of other East Asian samples including Singapore Chinese (35.9%) 7 and urban Chinese (40.0%). 12 The prevalence of high myopia (SE o À 5.0 D or À 6.0 D) in our study sample was 1.2% or 1.0%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 3 more Smart Citations