2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3432565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractive phenomena in the shock wave dispersion with variable gradients

Abstract: In this article the refraction effects in the weak shock wave ͑SW͒ dispersion on an interface with a temperature variation between two mediums are described. In the case of a finite-gradient boundary, the effect of the SW dispersion is remarkably stronger than in the case of a step change in parameters. In the former case the vertical component of velocity for the transmitted SW ͑the refraction effect͒ must be taken into account. Results of comparative calculations based on the two-dimensional model corrected … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a smooth boundary, 19 the coefficient b in the velocity ratio (15) is equal 1 = 2 exactly (1/R ¼ 0) since the Mach number does not change across the interface. For a sharp boundary, 21 the coefficient b is remarkably smaller than 1 = 2 since the velocity ratio (2) is dependent also on the Mach number ratio. This Mach number ratio decreases across the interface at a rate close to the square root law, making b much smaller than 1 = 2 .…”
Section: Parameter Distribution Across the Shock Wave Refracted Omentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a smooth boundary, 19 the coefficient b in the velocity ratio (15) is equal 1 = 2 exactly (1/R ¼ 0) since the Mach number does not change across the interface. For a sharp boundary, 21 the coefficient b is remarkably smaller than 1 = 2 since the velocity ratio (2) is dependent also on the Mach number ratio. This Mach number ratio decreases across the interface at a rate close to the square root law, making b much smaller than 1 = 2 .…”
Section: Parameter Distribution Across the Shock Wave Refracted Omentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We want to calculate the shape of the shock front (X i , Y i ) dispersed on a spherical interface of radius R with the coordinates (x i , y i ) as in Ref. 21…”
Section: Parameter Distribution Across the Shock Wave Refracted Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, the refracted shock speed and the angle of refraction can be determined with the refraction equations. 17 The second stage takes place when the refracted shock wave starts to propagate from the interface through the medium with the decreasing density. Here, the shock front coordinates and the speed as a function of time are to be determined using the relations obtained in the paper.…”
Section: Cumulative Effect In the Presence Of An Interface: Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was accounted in the equations that now are requiring the solution of the transcendental equation determining the Mach number for the refracted shock M 2n . 17 To explore the effect of the boundary type alone, the rest of the problem parameters were kept fixed, and only two different Mach number ratios in the equations were used. The results plotted in Fig.…”
Section: -5 a Markhotokmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation