2011
DOI: 10.5194/amt-4-2007-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractivity and temperature climate records from multiple radio occultation satellites consistent within 0.05%

Abstract: Abstract. Data consistency is an important prerequisite to build radio occultation (RO) climatologies based on a combined record of data from different satellites. The presence of multiple RO receiving satellites in orbit over the same time period allows for testing this consistency. We used RO data from CHAMP (CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload for geoscientific research), six FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellites (Formosa Satellite Mission 3/Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate, F3C),… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
82
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Altitude and latitude resolved zonal‐mean temperature climatologies based on RO data from different F3C satellites show excellent agreement with differences of <0.1 K between 8 km and 35 km altitude, and of <0.04 K in the overall mean [ Foelsche et al , 2008c, 2009a]. Pirscher [2010] and Foelsche et al [2011] carried out a detailed validation of multisatellite climatologies of fundamental atmospheric variables. Figure 1 illustrates the consistency of monthly temperature climatologies (with sampling error subtracted) from different satellites, GPS/Met, CHAMP, SAC‐C, GRACE, and F3C‐FM1 to F3C‐FM6 [cf.…”
Section: Ro Missions Data Characteristics and Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Altitude and latitude resolved zonal‐mean temperature climatologies based on RO data from different F3C satellites show excellent agreement with differences of <0.1 K between 8 km and 35 km altitude, and of <0.04 K in the overall mean [ Foelsche et al , 2008c, 2009a]. Pirscher [2010] and Foelsche et al [2011] carried out a detailed validation of multisatellite climatologies of fundamental atmospheric variables. Figure 1 illustrates the consistency of monthly temperature climatologies (with sampling error subtracted) from different satellites, GPS/Met, CHAMP, SAC‐C, GRACE, and F3C‐FM1 to F3C‐FM6 [cf.…”
Section: Ro Missions Data Characteristics and Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement at 25 km to 35 km is basically around 0.2 K and at most <0.3 K. At 8 km to 25 km the agreement is better than 0.1 K, and <0.05 K in the global mean. No indications for instrument degradation, instationarities in the RO records or temporal trends in sampling pattern were found [ Foelsche et al , 2011], demonstrating that it is possible to combine RO climatologies from different satellites to a single climate record without inter‐calibration or correction, provided the same processing system is used.…”
Section: Ro Missions Data Characteristics and Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses the reprocessed RO data sets processed by the Cosmic Data Analysis and Archive Center, which include occultations from the following satellite missions: Constellation Observation System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (Anthes et al, ), Meteorological Operational Polar Satellite A/Global Navigation Satellite System Receiver for Atmospheric Sounding (Von Engeln et al, ), Meteorological Operational Polar Satellite B/Global Navigation Satellite System Receiver for Atmospheric Sounding, and the Challenging Minisatellite Payload (Wickert et al, ). Because the RO technique does not suffer from intersatellite calibration effects (Foelsche et al, ), profiles from different satellite missions can be used together as long as they are processed with the same algorithm. Temperatures from 500 to 70 hPa are taken from the level 2 wetPrf products of the above missions.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 3.0 License. Schmidt et al, 2005Schmidt et al, , 2008Schmidt et al, , 2010Loescher and Kirchengast, 2008;Ho et al, 2009Ho et al, , 2012Foelsche et al, 2011a;Lackner et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified