2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refractory Vasospastic Angina and Sudden Cardiac Arrest: Is Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Indicated and Is It Always Protective?

Abstract: Vasospastic angina (VSA) is characterized by episodic chest pain associated with transient STsegment abnormalities on electrocardiogram, secondary to vasospasm of the epicardial coronary artery. We report the rare case of a 46-year-old female with refractory VSA secondary to multivessel coronary vasospasm causing an anterior myocardial infarction. She succumbed secondary to ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm, in spite of being on maximally tolerated medical therapy and having an implantable cardioverter defibr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are no guidelines for ICD implantation in primary prevention for coronary vasospasm despite its potential to cause lethal arrhythmias. In secondary prevention, contemporary guidelines recommend ICD implantation in these patients, if they are already on optimal medical therapy or if medical therapy is not tolerated (Class IIa) [ 12 ]. The indication for ICD should be restricted to life-threatening situations, which are defined by the following criteria: i) ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia; ii) syncope or cardiac arrest; iii) high-degree atrioventricular block or sinoatrial block; iv) left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35 %; v) familial history of sudden cardiac death or inherited arrhythmia syndrome [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no guidelines for ICD implantation in primary prevention for coronary vasospasm despite its potential to cause lethal arrhythmias. In secondary prevention, contemporary guidelines recommend ICD implantation in these patients, if they are already on optimal medical therapy or if medical therapy is not tolerated (Class IIa) [ 12 ]. The indication for ICD should be restricted to life-threatening situations, which are defined by the following criteria: i) ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia; ii) syncope or cardiac arrest; iii) high-degree atrioventricular block or sinoatrial block; iv) left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35 %; v) familial history of sudden cardiac death or inherited arrhythmia syndrome [ 10 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%