1997
DOI: 10.1097/00004694-199703000-00075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refracture of the Forearm in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides excellent clinical results after both techniques, the following complications have all been reported: refracture, synostosis, malunion, nonunion, infection, compartment syndrome, nerve injury, and poor cosmesis. 4,[13][14][15][29][30][31] In our study, both surgical techniques achieved similar clinical outcomes. However, intramedullary Kirschner wiring was a better treatment for unstable forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients older than 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Besides excellent clinical results after both techniques, the following complications have all been reported: refracture, synostosis, malunion, nonunion, infection, compartment syndrome, nerve injury, and poor cosmesis. 4,[13][14][15][29][30][31] In our study, both surgical techniques achieved similar clinical outcomes. However, intramedullary Kirschner wiring was a better treatment for unstable forearm fractures in skeletally immature patients older than 10 years.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Therefore, given that these fractures are relatively unstable, and despite the fact that our study shows no displacement of this type of fracture in case, we recommend radiographic follow-up 2 weeks after the start of treatment. Our study and others show that full healing generally occurs within 4-6 weeks [16,17]. In our opinion, if clinical examination after cast removal shows no signs of malunion-clinical appearance of deformity of the fractured forearm compared with the contralateral forearmradiographic examination is unnecessary.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…An important result of the Hauschildt PHOENIX models is that they support mass ejection and a wind that can have solar element abundances because the line features are often more sensitive to non-LTE effects and the assumed density distribution than to abundances (Hauschildt et al 1997). This was demonstrated in the analysis of nova OS And/1986 by Schwarz et al (1997), who modeled its 'Fe II' spectrum successfully with solar abundances. Kato & Hachisu (2009 have conducted studies of the photospheric regions of novae in which they consider the hydrodynamics of the emitting gas as it transitions from a static to an optically thick wind geometry.…”
Section: Current Spectral Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%