Reframing Language Education in the Light of Ecological Linguistics

Abstract

The notion of Ecological Linguistics is not new and has been discussed many decades ago. However, its theoretical construction is still open-ended and its implication to practical areas, such as the language pedagogies, calls for more studies either theoretical, empirical, or experiential. This paper is written to sustain the open-ended discussion and elaborate on some important works which contribute to strengthening the theory and reframing the Language Education practices. It firstly discusses different lenses in understanding language from the simple one to the most complex assumption; the ecological view. It then continues with the overview of how the word "ecology" has been used in Applied Linguistics and called for the new area called Ecolinguistics, what are its strands and prospect for future studies in the field, and what are possible implications for language teaching practices, including those of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). In conclusion, despite the ongoing snapshot of Ecolinguistics, this paper recognizes its visionary and transformative influence on language theories development and language education practices.

Reflecting on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, and Assessment (CEFR) in the Indonesian Context

“…There are some characteristics of ecological language pedagogy through action-based learning according to Leo van Lier dan others. Three of them are summarised in Novawan, et al (2022), as follows:…”

The Power of Language Learning Beyond the Classroom to English Mastery of an EFL Learner

“…For instance, as the internet can be useful for some learners in terms of providing learning resources, it can be their affordance. In addition, learners should also figure out their niche, an environment that is "mediated by language" (Novawan et al, 2022) where learners find plenty of support in learning. In a niche, learners belong to a habitat where they can find language affordances.…”