2018
DOI: 10.1002/he.20267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reframing Rigor: A Modern Look at Challenge and Support in Higher Education

Abstract: This chapter describes the limitations of the traditional notions of academic rigor in higher education, and brings forth a new form of rigor that has the potential to support student success and equity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "hidden" curriculum is there is a culture to align grades/GPA in engineering and mathematics and the pace at which you can achieve those grades to current and future success. Researchers have noted the consequences of engineering rigor, particularly negative impacts to students' physical and mental health (Campbell et al, 2018) and students leaving STEM majors (Geisinger & Raman, 2013). This HC was the most common for majority White or Asian, men, where they frequently made no major changes to their strategy or worked harder to overcome HC, aligning with the dominant values of meritocracy in engineering (Erickson, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "hidden" curriculum is there is a culture to align grades/GPA in engineering and mathematics and the pace at which you can achieve those grades to current and future success. Researchers have noted the consequences of engineering rigor, particularly negative impacts to students' physical and mental health (Campbell et al, 2018) and students leaving STEM majors (Geisinger & Raman, 2013). This HC was the most common for majority White or Asian, men, where they frequently made no major changes to their strategy or worked harder to overcome HC, aligning with the dominant values of meritocracy in engineering (Erickson, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would make the gratitude module problematic. In addition, participants in the trial of ENHANCE-II were enrolled at an engineering college, where people valorize a culture of rigor and overwork (Campbell et al, 2018;Stiwne & Jungert, 2010). They may have felt resentful if prompted to think about gratitude and appreciation, and these modules were therefore better suited for removal.…”
Section: Workbook Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, this acculturation process at the undergraduate level takes the form of weed-out courses that use outdated Eurocentric and malecentric pedagogical practices, with a curriculum that is not representative of the diverse tapestry of today's students (Gasiewski et al, 2012;Green & Glasson, 2009;Seymour & Hewitt, 1997). At the graduate level, these challenges may be exacerbated when compounded with the demands of similar classroom experiences, as well as grueling numbers of hours and racial and gendered microaggressions within the research laboratory, complicated interactions with one's advisor and peers, and their cumulative effects Campbell et al, 2018;McGee et al, 2019;Perez et al, 2019). Taken together, classroom, laboratory, advising, and peer interactions tend to serve as implicit gatekeepers to persistence and broadening participation in STEM.…”
Section: Theory and Literature On Motivation Stem And Black Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%